Even after he had only just won the recent election and became President of the Republic of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad almost immediately got my attention.  And my interrupted monitoring of his activities and pronouncements was neither his fault nor mine.  The fault can be laid, as it almost always can be, at the doorstep of 'America's' Zionist mass media.

 

Frustrated by the Zionist media monopoly that dumbs down America and thereby puts all the might and power of America at the disposal of that unaccountable, and for the most part, domestically unrecognizable international threat that is Israel, I drew a mark in the sand of the miserable military misadventure that is now defined as the failed war in Iraq. <http://www.rense.com/general66/rag.htm>

 

On June 15, 2005, almost a year ago, the New York Times continued its spike of the Downing Street Memo, which, had it been publicized to the degree that it should have been, would have put the Bush regime on a much faster track of public recognition only now being evidenced that addresses the Bush regime's criminal activities and complicity in both 9-11 and the failed war in Iraq.

 

The Bush criminals are indeed preparing for a nuclear air strike against Iran with the resultant destruction of the dollar, the total collapse of the American economy and the vaporization of both our national security and our American way of life.  We will then be introduced to the beneficence of the New World Order way of life, replacing the land of the free and the home of the brave to a people and nation subjugated by the jackboots of fear, terror and poverty. 

 

The New York Times, that premier Zionist propaganda rag, could have reported on Downing, but didn't.  It could have reported the follow-on memos, but didn't.  It could have aired the conference between Bush and Blair in which the two international war criminals were discussing drawing Saddam's fire by false flag flights of "UN" aircraft to create a reason for the invasion; but they didn't.  Since June 15, 2005, when the Times had the opportunity to lift the lid on the stinking, rotten Bush regime, an additional 737 members of our military have lost their lives.  America thanks you, New York Times.

 

It would be wonderful if America had a free and independent press.  Think of Nixon.  Think of Clinton.  And for the really informed, consider the disappearance of Charlie Sheen, Ed Asner and former Secretary of State, Colin Powell.  Why no journalistic follow-up on these people?  Why not follow-up on the Bush people who have turned on our chief executive "decider" and war criminal?  Powerful personalities such as Sheen, and Asner, and Mel Gibson can easily go where no woman has gone before; namely, to the front pages of public awareness.  Cindy Sheehan tried, but the Zionist media marginalized her.  And "Tinhorn Lizzie" and Hillaroid are in lockstep harmony with Cheney and Rumsfeld's New World Order.

 

But now, on an ever increasing basis, a real president and a real man is stepping forward and telling it like it is.  If Europe and the West are so deeply in love with Israel, why won't the nations of Europe carve out some of their own territory and create a new Israel right amongst them, asks a real president.  What better a safety margin could be created for the apple of their geopolitical eye he asks.  And of course, he correctly asserts the patently obvious: Israel is the cause of all the evil and unrest in the world.  Right again! This led him to emote: "Israel will be wiped off the face of the Earth."  This is probably true, as the nations of the world will get together to make this happen after Israel gets America to destroy itself under the leadership of our "decider."

 

So why would anyone reading and understanding any of this expect to see such truths boldly in print from the New York Times?  Would anyone understanding this expect to see this in the impeachment-generating Washington Post?  How come the Post always blows its horn as concerns the Watergate affair leading to Nixon's resignation that precluded his impeachment?  Isn't the Post a "left-liberal" rag as well?  Don't they hate the GOP?  What's so different about Bush?  How often do executives and owners of the Post attend secret Bilderberg meetings?

 

The focus of the criminal Bush regime is now on Iran.  Unquestionably, military plans for the attack on Iran have been completed.  Timing is now of the essence.  Fitzpatrick is closing in, and Frank Rich of the New York Times has had it.  He's closing in as well. 
 

I have oft offered in this space that the serpentine, criminal Bush regime will strike when cornered, and this is about to happen.  But then again, maybe not.

 

The rebuke of Rumsfeld by retired upper echelons of our military is indeed a starting point.  Current military leaders with a conscience and with a true moral compass, as well as a patriotic dedication to both our military rank and file as well as a normal sense of loyalty to our nation, will begin to heed the advice of those who have gone before, and just maybe, the much-needed public renouncement of the Bush war machine will bring its wheels of death and destruction to a screeching halt.  Increasingly, the public is rejecting Bush and his war criminals.  They are becoming more aware of what the GOP-dominated Congress has done to their Bill of Rights. 

 

Absent the leadership of a Charlie Sheen or a Mel Gibson, we have another "man for all seasons."  He is none other than Bush's latest nemesis, Sir Mahmoud Ahmadinejad!  The frightened, the uninformed, the propagandized will insist that we read sections of the Koran to really understand how horrible Islam is.  Their fear and ignorance offers that we must eradicate these dangerous people from the face of the Earth.  They must be totally ethnically cleansed to give Israel "Lebensraum" and US unlimited access to their oil.  Fear mongering and hate propaganda is what the mainstream Zionist media and the Bush GOP are all about. 
 

So what is President Ahmadinejad all about?

 

Here are selected excerpts from his letter to our "decider," G. Bush, president:
 

"Can one be a follower of Jesus Christ, the great messenger of God, feel obliged to respect human rights, present liberalism as a civilization model, announce one's opposition to the proliferation of nuclear weapons and WMDs, make [opposition to] 'War and Terror' his slogan, and finally, work toward the establishment of a unified international community -- a community which Christ and the virtuous of the Earth will one day govern, but at the same time, have countries attacked; the lives, reputations and possessions of people destroyed. . . ."

 

The President of Iran's letter has probably been posted on several sites, but our "American" mass media will, of course, be too embarrassed to print it and inform and educate the American people.  Here's another gem from President Ahmadinejad:
 

"Hundreds of billions of dollars spent from the treasury of one country and certain other countries, and tens of thousands of young men and women - as occupation troops - put in harm's way, taken away from family and loved ones, their hands stained with the blood of others, subjected to so much psychological pressure that every day some commit suicide and those returning home suffer depression, become sickly and grapple with all sorts of ailments; while some are killed."

 

How can the legitimate ruler of a great nation, a nation that our illegitimately appointed illiterate and uneducated "decider" buffoon wants US to fear as a threat, be so in touch with America while our stoopid "decider" is so out of touch?  The guy that just moved in next door to me is almost my age - why did he move?  President Ahmadinejad just identified him in the previous quote.  The guy my age that just moved in could no longer remain in his former house - his son shot himself in the driveway of their former home where the boy grew up.  He had just returned safely from a tour in Iraq!  America thanks you, mr. Bush.

 

But the "decider's" family members, going by the names of Barbara and Laura, do not wish to be confronted by bad tidings and realities such as these.  Why after all, should Barbara disturb her "beautiful mind" with the horrors of war?  It's not her kids that are fighting and dying for Israel and oil.  And who cares about bad opinion polls?  Perhaps only easy poetry and prose on a kindergarten level is all they can handle intellectually, so here's one for them:

 

The Decider

 

Little Miss Muffet, sat on a tuffet,

With curds and whey in a pan;

Along came the Decider, who sat down beside her,

And sent her to die in Iran.

 

As we continue to lose women in combat, legitimized by a low class skirt chasing draft dodger, another combat dodger swaggers across an aircraft carrier's deck with the San Diego skyline in the background thumbing up "mission accomplished."  And more and more, scientists, professors, engineers and former Bushmen are coming out of the Beltway jungle and accusing him and his PNAC cabal of deliberately slaughtering 3,000 of our fellow citizens to get US pissed off enough to declare war on whoever fits the current Bush profile of "evildoer."

 

Here's a real President on that question -- quote follows:
 

"Mr. Bush: Sept. 11 was a horrendous incident.  The killing of innocents is deplorable. . . .  Our government immediately declared its disgust with the perpetrators and offered its condolences to the bereaved. . . .  All governments have a duty to protect the lives, property and good standing of their citizens.  Reportedly your government employs extensive security . . . and intelligence systems. . . .  Sept. 11 was not a simple operation.  Could it be planned and executed without coordination with intelligence and security services ? or their extensive infiltration?

 

Why have the various aspects of the attacks been kept secret?  Why aren't we told who botched their responsibilities?  And why aren't those responsible identified and put on trial?  All governments have a duty to provide security and peace of mind for their citizens. . . .  After 9-11, instead of healing and tending to the emotional wounds of the survivors and the American people . . . some Western media . . . constantly talked about the possibility of new terror attacks and kept the people in fear.  Is that a service to the American people? . . .

 

Why was the media, instead of conveying a feeling of security and providing peace of mind, giving rise to a feeling of insecurity?  Some believe that the exaggerations paved the way -- and were the justification -- for an attack on Afghanistan."

 

This is why President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is "a man for all seasons."  He neither hides behind a woman's skirts nor uses the media to block for him.  Our potential "enemy" is more in tune with our nation than our own despicable criminal government.
 

About the only thing our "decider" got right, and that occurring purely by accident, is that it is indeed time for a "regime change."  Perhaps the real President would accept our offer and contract with America to serve as OUR president, and we could simply outsource Bush to Iran.  Bush destroyed America in only five years ? Iran should be a cakewalk!

~~~~~~~~~

The prescient view of Edgar Steele at the time of the Iraq attack:

“If we get our butts kicked in Iraq, count on the Arabs then turning on Israel, which can respond only with nuclear weapons.    That will draw in Russia [or China - CR] , who will turn Israel into a giant, self-illuminated glass parking lot.  That, in turn, forces America to respond in kind, since America now is run by Zionists.  "Saddamed if We Do, Saddamed if We Don't," which I wrote back in November, seems even more relevant today - http://www.conspiracypenpal.com/columns/saddamed.htm . In other words, World War III has begun, to the delight of both the Arabs and Israel, both of whom think they will prevail when the dust settles.  America, as usual, is the giant pawn in play.”
-  Edgar J. Steele