Vast Majority of Oncologists Would NOT Use Chemotherapy If They Got Cancer
“Over 75% of
the oncologists polled said that if they had cancer they would never use the
same chemotherapy
they prescribe for their patients on themselves because of the ineffectiveness
of chemotherapy
and its unacceptable degree of toxicity.”
- Los Angeles Times report
Basically, would you rely on someone who does not himself dare to
use the same methods and items which he preaches, prescribes and
carries out on others, making money in the process? I highly doubt I
would.
Here’s a startling fact regarding oncologists, the so-called cancer
specialists of conventional medicine, and chemotherapy, one of their
main and favorite cancer-fighting weapons. This was obtained from a
McGill Cancer Center survey which was cited in the book “Reclaiming
Our Health”, written by John Robbins:
75% of Americans
diagnosed with cancer are said to receive chemotherapy treatment,
Do we really need to say more about the safety and effectiveness of
chemotherapy? Be your own judge.
Cancer quotes:
“Chemotherapy and radiation do not make the body well. They
destroy, they do not heal. The hope of the doctor is that the cancer
will be destroyed without destroying the entire patient. These
therapies do kill cancer cells, but they kill a lot of good cells
too including the cells of the immune system, the very system that
one NEEDS to get well. If a cancer patient survives the treatment
with enough immune system left intact, the patient may appear to get
well at least temporarily, but he will have sustained major damage
to his body and his immune system. How much better it is to nourish
the immune system directly by the use of natural therapies to assist
it in getting you well instead of destroying it by the use of these
therapies. Then the immune system itself can kill the cancer cells
without any side effects and heal your body at the same time.”
“The New England Journal of Medicine Reports War on Cancer Is a
Failure: Despite $30 billion spent on research and treatments since
1970, cancer remains ‘undefeated’, with a death rate not lower but
6% higher in 1997 than 1970.”
“Doctors are too busy to dig into the statistics of cancer
treatments, they assume that what they are taught at school or what
is demonstrated in the pages of briefing journals is the best
treatment. They cannot afford to suspect that these treatments are
only the best for the pharmaceutical companies that influence their
'institutions of higher learning'.”
“The five year survival rates for the major cancers are:
stomach - 5%, trachea, bronchus and lung - 5%, breast - 50%,
oesophagus - 5%, large intestine - 22%, pancreas - 4%, liver - 2%
... attacking the tumor with the slash/burn/poison version of cancer
therapy, and then pronouncing "cured" after the five year survival
period has elapsed, has, of course, nothing remotely to do with the
successful treatment of the disease. Patients who die from the
effects of chemo or radio "therapy" after more than five years have
passed are counted as cured. Being dead or dying does not exclude
one from the figures of the cancer industry's creative
statisticians.”
“One of the most important things I have ever heard was said
to me by an oncological nurse. She was a member of an adult college
class I was taking in 1989. When she found out I'd been diagnosed
with cancer [and] was entering into treatment for lymphoma, she took
it upon herself to say to me, unbidden and unasked, 'Elliot, YOU
have GOT to TAKE CONTROL of YOUR OWN treatment, or THE DOCTORS WILL
TURN YOU INTO A PIECE OF MEAT.' Truer words were never spoken!
Because that nurse had thought it important enough to say that to me
without my ever asking, I took what she said very much to heart, and
I know her words saved me a great deal of grief!”
"What you must understand, Mr. Gearin-Tosh, is that we know so
little about how the body works." ### |